• ReSolution
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Application
0 Items
New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre
  • ReSolution
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Application
  • Process Options
  • Arbitration
    • COVID-19: Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Initiating Arbitration
    • MODEL CLAUSE
    • Arbitration Rules
    • Arbitration Fees
      • Ad hoc arbitration fees
      • NZDRC Institutional Arbitration Fees
        • Arbitration: Preliminary Fees Calculator
      • Fixed Fee Arbitration
      • Fees for Arbitrations under other institutional rules
    • Arbitration Guides and Resources
  • Arb-Med
    • Initiating Arb-Med
    • MODEL CLAUSE
    • RULES
    • PROTOCOL
    • FEES
    • GUIDES AND RESOURCES
  • Mediation
    • COVID-19: Lease Disputes
    • Initiating Mediation
    • MODEL CLAUSE
    • Mediation Rules
    • PROTOCOL
    • FEES
    • GUIDES AND RESOURCES
  • Expert Determination
    • APPLY
    • MODEL CLAUSE
    • RULES
    • FEES
    • GUIDES AND RESOURCES
  • Early Neutral Evaluation
    • APPLY
    • MODEL CLAUSE
    • RULES
    • FEES
    • GUIDES AND RESOURCES
    • FAQ
  • Expertise
    • Commercial Disputes
    • Trust Disputes
    • Property Disputes
    • IT Disputes
    • Financial Services Disputes
    • Building and Construction Disputes
    • International Commercial Disputes
    • Employment Disputes
    • IP Disputes
    • Insurance Disputes
    • Family and Relationship Disputes
Select Page

Home / arbitration

Sign of the times: enforcing an arbitration agreement exchanged by electronic counterparts

Sign of the times: enforcing an arbitration agreement exchanged by electronic counterparts

by Virginia Bonanni | Mar 15, 2022 | Arbitration, NZDRC

By Belinda Green In the electronic era, documents often do not exist in physical form. Does this affect their enforceability? Recent decisions from Australia and New Zealand show that our mindset about what an original or duly certified copy is might need to change...
Court thwarts bad faith attempt to lift veil of confidentiality of international arbitration award

Court thwarts bad faith attempt to lift veil of confidentiality of international arbitration award

by Virginia Bonanni | Mar 15, 2022 | Arbitration, NZDRC

By Maria Cole The confidentiality of arbitral proceedings is important. It is protected by statute and model law. In EBJ21 v EBO21,[1] the Federal Court of Australia refused to have its processes used to erode or undermine the parties’ agreement to, and the law’s...
New Zealand still rated as global leader for public sector transparency, honesty and integrity

New Zealand still rated as global leader for public sector transparency, honesty and integrity

by Virginia Bonanni | Jan 28, 2022 | Arbitration, Mediation, NZDRC

Transparency International has just released the 2021 Corruption Perception Index (CPI). New Zealand has retained its joint number one ranking along with Denmark, as having one of the least corrupt public sectors in the world. This year Finland joins the top-slot as...
Wilful Breaches of Contract – Do Exclusion Clauses and Liability Caps Still Work?

Wilful Breaches of Contract – Do Exclusion Clauses and Liability Caps Still Work?

by Virginia Bonanni | Jan 28, 2022 | Arbitration, Mediation, NZDRC, resolution issue

Can deliberate or wilful contract breaches still benefit from clauses that limit or exclude liability? The English High Court recently considered this issue in Mott Macdonald Ltd v Trant Engineering Ltd,[1] which confirmed that clauses limiting or excluding liability...
Clause and effect: the importance of well-drafted model clauses

Clause and effect: the importance of well-drafted model clauses

by Virginia Bonanni | Dec 17, 2021 | Arbitration, NZDRC

An overview of why well-drafted model clauses matter Introduction Contracts, like disputes, come in all shapes and sizes. Most parties to a contract are keen to get the deal finalised and signed on the dotted line as quickly as possible. There isn’t always an...
English High Court confirms that parties are not permitted to raise a counterclaim at enforcement stage of a New York Convention award

English High Court confirms that parties are not permitted to raise a counterclaim at enforcement stage of a New York Convention award

by Virginia Bonanni | Dec 17, 2021 | Arb-Med, Arbitration, NZDRC

In Selevision Saudi Co v BeIN Media Group LLC [2021] EWHC 2802 (Comm), the High Court in England and Wales held that it had no jurisdiction to permit a counterclaim at the enforcement stage of a New York Convention award pursuant to the English Arbitration Act given...
Leaky Home Case: Failure to obtain a building report results in reduction of damages for contributory negligence

Leaky Home Case: Failure to obtain a building report results in reduction of damages for contributory negligence

by Virginia Bonanni | Oct 15, 2021 | Arbitration, Conflict Management, Mediation, NZDRC, Property, Property disputes

By Melt Strydom. Apportionment for contributory negligence allows a court to share the responsibility between parties in circumstances where the test for causation and remoteness of damage justifies it. It doesn’t mean a respondent will not be held liable for...

Resolving cross lease disputes

by Natalia Vila | Sep 13, 2021 | Arbitration, Cross lease disputes, Mediation, Property disputes

THE JOYS OF A Cross lease And how to survive disputes with your neighbour By Natalia Vila Going through another COVID-19 lockdown can be challenging, and disputes with neighbours may crystallise with people spending more time at home. Cross leases have been used for...
UK Supreme Court returns to orthodox liquidated damages approach

UK Supreme Court returns to orthodox liquidated damages approach

by Virginia Bonanni | Sep 8, 2021 | Arbitration, Conflict Management, IT Dispute Resolution, Mediation, NZDRC

By Melissa Perkin. The UK Supreme Court in its recent judgment in Triple Point Technology v PTT Public Company[1] has brought welcome clarity in relation to the drafting and interpretation of liquidated damages clauses[2] in construction, commercial and technology...

About Us

Fair, prompt and cost effective conflict management and dispute resolution services. Proudly serving industry, commerce and the community for 25 years.

Find Out More
  • in
  • tw
  • fb

Services

  • Process Options
  • Arbitration
  • Arb-Med
  • Mediation
  • Expert Determination
  • Early Neutral Evaluation
  • Conflict Management
  • Resources
  • Panellists
  • Sustainability
  • Terms and Conditions

Contact Us

0508 DISPUTE

(0508 3477 883) Apply Now Email Us

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress